1,940
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 21:
Line 21: − + − − Check list - +
A Professional Learning Community Approach for Teacher Development and OER creation - A toolkit/Planning the PLC-OER program (view source)
Revision as of 10:20, 3 January 2018
, 10:20, 3 January 2018→Perspective plan
=== Perspective plan ===
=== Perspective plan ===
Since the STF is likely to be a multi-year program, a perspective plan would be useful to prepare. This plan would discuss the vision of program, identify priorities for the state, recognizing the contexts and challenges in TPD. The plan would also provide direction in terms of the components being prioritised and the subject teachers covered for participation in the PLCs. The plan would also include the phased development of in-house ICT infrastructure, in schools as well as in the teacher education institutions at state, district, block and cluster levels.
Since the STF is likely to be a multi-year program, a perspective plan would be useful to prepare. This plan would discuss the vision of program, identify priorities for the state, recognizing the contexts and challenges in TPD. The plan would also provide direction in terms of the components being prioritised and the subject teachers covered for participation in the PLCs. The plan would also include the phased development of in-house ICT infrastructure, in schools as well as in the teacher education institutions at state, district, block and cluster levels.
Resource - Illustrative Perspective plan
Resource - Illustrative Perspective plan
=== Preparation of Annual Work Plans (AWP) every year ===
=== Preparation of Annual Work Plans (AWP) every year ===
The detailed planning and budgeting for the program would need to be done as part of the AWP processes. Since the program is envisaged as as a part of the regular in-service teacher education of the government, funding would be secured from Central (RMSA/SSA) and state government budgets. The AWP would discuss the specific objectives of the program for the year, investments, risks/challenges and expected outcomes.
The detailed planning and budgeting for the program would need to be done as part of the AWP processes. Since the program is envisaged as as a part of the regular in-service teacher education of the government, funding would be secured from Central (RMSA/SSA) and state government budgets. The AWP would discuss the specific objectives of the program for the year, investments, risks/challenges and expected outcomes.
Resource - Illustrative AWP
=== Establishing state and district level design and implementation teams ===
=== Establishing state and district level design and implementation teams ===