Difference between revisions of "Krashen hypotheses"

From Open Educational Resources
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "The primary purpose of language is to communicate. Yet, many children who spend years learning a language in school, are unable to communicate freely in that language. This is...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The primary purpose of language is to communicate. Yet, many children who spend years learning a language in school, are unable to communicate freely in that language. This issue is visible with regard to English. Even as the age for learning English is reduced and states are moving to English as the medium of instruction, we find that children do not acquire communicative skills in English.
 
The primary purpose of language is to communicate. Yet, many children who spend years learning a language in school, are unable to communicate freely in that language. This issue is visible with regard to English. Even as the age for learning English is reduced and states are moving to English as the medium of instruction, we find that children do not acquire communicative skills in English.
  
 +
=== Krashen's hypotheses ===
 
Stephen Krashen a linguist, has done extensive research on second language learning, and his 'hypotheses' governing language learning are relevant to ELT. His hypotheses are:
 
Stephen Krashen a linguist, has done extensive research on second language learning, and his 'hypotheses' governing language learning are relevant to ELT. His hypotheses are:
 
+
# acquisition-learning hypothesis,
acquisition-learning hypothesis,
+
# input hypothesis,
input hypothesis,
+
# monitor hypothesis,
monitor hypothesis,
+
# affective filter and
affective filter, and
+
# natural order hypothesis
natural order hypothesis
 
 
 
  
 
Understanding these hypotheses and integrating the principles into our ELT program can enable the classroom to support learners acquire communicative skills in the English Language (and any other language as well).
 
Understanding these hypotheses and integrating the principles into our ELT program can enable the classroom to support learners acquire communicative skills in the English Language (and any other language as well).
  
Krashen says "Acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language - natural communication - in which speakers are concerned not with the form of their utterances but with the messages they are conveying and understanding. The best methods are therefore those that supply 'comprehensible input' in low anxiety situations, containing messages that students really want to hear. These methods do not force early production in the second language, but allow students to produce when they are 'ready', recognizing that improvement comes from supplying communicative and comprehensible input, and not from forcing and correcting production."
+
Krashen says "'''Acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language - natural communication - in which speakers are concerned not with the form of their utterances but with the messages they are conveying and understanding. The best methods are therefore those that supply 'comprehensible input' in low anxiety situations, containing messages that students really want to hear. These methods do not force early production in the second language, but allow students to produce when they are 'ready', recognizing that improvement comes from supplying communicative and comprehensible input, and not from forcing and correcting production'''."
  
 +
=== Integrating Krashen's hypotheses in work with Government schools ===
 
In the 'Teachers Communities of Learning' (TCOL) program, IT for Change has attempted to bring these hypotheses into program design and transaction and seen significant validity for these.
 
In the 'Teachers Communities of Learning' (TCOL) program, IT for Change has attempted to bring these hypotheses into program design and transaction and seen significant validity for these.
  
 
Apart from the application of the hypotheses, there is one more significant benefit to ELT -  we can identify pedagogies that are actually harmful to language learning, such as
 
Apart from the application of the hypotheses, there is one more significant benefit to ELT -  we can identify pedagogies that are actually harmful to language learning, such as
 +
# not providing adequate input (which has to be audio/video-rich, not only text rich)
 +
# most input provided is not very contextual or meaningful to the learner (some textbook chapters)    expecting production too soon - both reading and writing
 +
# premature and excessive focus on formal grammar 
 +
# not providing adequate peer learning possibilities 
 +
# creating a stressful environment of 'achievement/production'
  
    not providing adequate input (which has to be audio/video-rich, not only text rich)
+
=== Books written by Krashen ===
    most input provided is not very contextual or meaningful to the learner (some textbook chapters)
+
[http://sdkrashen.com/content/books/sl_acquisition_and_learning.pdf Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning] - Stephen D Krashen URL.  This book available for free download for non commercial purposes, following chapters are especially useful:
    expecting production too soon - both reading and writing
 
    premature and excessive focus on formal grammar
 
    not providing adequate peer learning possibilities
 
    creating a stressful environment of 'achievement/production'
 
  
 +
5. The Role of the First Language in Second Language Acquisition
  
Book available for free download for non commercial purposes, following chapters are especially useful-
+
7. On Routines and Patterns in Language Acquisition and Performance
  
5. The Role of the First Language in Second Language Acquisition
 
7. On Routines and Patterns in Language Acquisition and Performance
 
 
8. Relating Theory and Practice in Adult Second Language Acquisition
 
8. Relating Theory and Practice in Adult Second Language Acquisition
  
 +
Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition - Krashen, S.D. URL                               
  
 
Book available for free download for non commercial purposes. Chapter III in this book focuses on 'Providing Input for Acquisition' - how the teacher can encourage subconscious acquisition of language. Chapter V discusses practical "Approaches to Language Teaching"
 
Book available for free download for non commercial purposes. Chapter III in this book focuses on 'Providing Input for Acquisition' - how the teacher can encourage subconscious acquisition of language. Chapter V discusses practical "Approaches to Language Teaching"

Revision as of 14:52, 21 July 2020

The primary purpose of language is to communicate. Yet, many children who spend years learning a language in school, are unable to communicate freely in that language. This issue is visible with regard to English. Even as the age for learning English is reduced and states are moving to English as the medium of instruction, we find that children do not acquire communicative skills in English.

Krashen's hypotheses

Stephen Krashen a linguist, has done extensive research on second language learning, and his 'hypotheses' governing language learning are relevant to ELT. His hypotheses are:

  1. acquisition-learning hypothesis,
  2. input hypothesis,
  3. monitor hypothesis,
  4. affective filter and
  5. natural order hypothesis

Understanding these hypotheses and integrating the principles into our ELT program can enable the classroom to support learners acquire communicative skills in the English Language (and any other language as well).

Krashen says "Acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language - natural communication - in which speakers are concerned not with the form of their utterances but with the messages they are conveying and understanding. The best methods are therefore those that supply 'comprehensible input' in low anxiety situations, containing messages that students really want to hear. These methods do not force early production in the second language, but allow students to produce when they are 'ready', recognizing that improvement comes from supplying communicative and comprehensible input, and not from forcing and correcting production."

Integrating Krashen's hypotheses in work with Government schools

In the 'Teachers Communities of Learning' (TCOL) program, IT for Change has attempted to bring these hypotheses into program design and transaction and seen significant validity for these.

Apart from the application of the hypotheses, there is one more significant benefit to ELT - we can identify pedagogies that are actually harmful to language learning, such as

  1. not providing adequate input (which has to be audio/video-rich, not only text rich)
  2. most input provided is not very contextual or meaningful to the learner (some textbook chapters) expecting production too soon - both reading and writing
  3. premature and excessive focus on formal grammar
  4. not providing adequate peer learning possibilities
  5. creating a stressful environment of 'achievement/production'

Books written by Krashen

Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning - Stephen D Krashen URL. This book available for free download for non commercial purposes, following chapters are especially useful:

5. The Role of the First Language in Second Language Acquisition

7. On Routines and Patterns in Language Acquisition and Performance

8. Relating Theory and Practice in Adult Second Language Acquisition

Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition - Krashen, S.D. URL

Book available for free download for non commercial purposes. Chapter III in this book focuses on 'Providing Input for Acquisition' - how the teacher can encourage subconscious acquisition of language. Chapter V discusses practical "Approaches to Language Teaching"