Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Navigate|Prev=Building Professional Learning Communities|Curr=Developing capabilities for OER creation|Next=Institutionalizing the program}} | | {{Navigate|Prev=Building Professional Learning Communities|Curr=Developing capabilities for OER creation|Next=Institutionalizing the program}} |
| + | |
| + | Open Educational Resources (OER) as 'materials offered freely and openly to use and adapt for teaching, learning, development and research.' |
| + | |
| + | - [https://web.archive.org/web/20130503135718/http://www.col.org/resources/crsMaterials/Pages/OCW-OER.aspx Commonwealth of Learning] |
| | | |
| === Participatory digital resource creation by PLCs === | | === Participatory digital resource creation by PLCs === |
Line 13: |
Line 17: |
| Since digital resources can be easily replicated, the marginal costs of sharing digital content is negligible. Teachers also need a common space where they can access resources for their classroom teaching, and also for TPD. The PLCs can serve as the forums where teachers can share the digital content accessed or created (or accessed and modified) by them, with their colleagues. | | Since digital resources can be easily replicated, the marginal costs of sharing digital content is negligible. Teachers also need a common space where they can access resources for their classroom teaching, and also for TPD. The PLCs can serve as the forums where teachers can share the digital content accessed or created (or accessed and modified) by them, with their colleagues. |
| | | |
− | Resources so shared in the PLCs can be vetted and curated and those meeting quality norms can be made available on-line, for easy and universal access. | + | Resources so shared in the PLCs can be vetted and curated and those meeting quality norms can be made available on-line, for easy and universal access. |
| + | |
| + | The NCFTE says, "Teacher education should engage teachers with the curriculum, syllabi and textbooks to critically examine them rather than taking them as ‘given’ and accepted without question". The processes of accessing, creating, reviewing, revising, sharing and publishing OER, definitely serves as an opportunity for teachers to engage with the curriculum, and go beyond the textbook for meeting their teaching needs. |
| | | |
| === Licensing digital content as Open Educational Resources (OER) === | | === Licensing digital content as Open Educational Resources (OER) === |
Line 85: |
Line 91: |
| '''National Platform v/s state platforms''' - For a country like India, with a federal structure, the national level repository [http://nroer.gov.in NROER] should be seen more as a role model (like NCERT text books) and states should set up their own OER platforms. State platforms can encourage greater participation of teachers in OER creation, revision and sharing. Over time SCERT should encourage DIETs / district groups to make their own localised resources and publish on state platforms, this can help bring to fruit, the 1995 MHRD guidelines for teacher education, which envisioned district level text books. In theory one platform for India can meet all requirements, in practice, states should have their own spaces for autonomous resource creation, revision, curation and sharing. Hence the resources created by the program should be hosted by the state governments as OER for wide use by teachers, and for adapting, revising and re-distributing. Telangana has developed the state OER platform using the MediaWiki CMS. Andhra Pradesh also has its state OER platform. The [http://teacher-network.in/OER/index.php Teacher Network] (on which this toolkit is available) can be used as a initial state repository. This site has been established and being maintained by IT for Change. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia ([http://cemca.org.in CEMCA]), an inter-governmental organization of the Commonwealth countries helped establish this platform. | | '''National Platform v/s state platforms''' - For a country like India, with a federal structure, the national level repository [http://nroer.gov.in NROER] should be seen more as a role model (like NCERT text books) and states should set up their own OER platforms. State platforms can encourage greater participation of teachers in OER creation, revision and sharing. Over time SCERT should encourage DIETs / district groups to make their own localised resources and publish on state platforms, this can help bring to fruit, the 1995 MHRD guidelines for teacher education, which envisioned district level text books. In theory one platform for India can meet all requirements, in practice, states should have their own spaces for autonomous resource creation, revision, curation and sharing. Hence the resources created by the program should be hosted by the state governments as OER for wide use by teachers, and for adapting, revising and re-distributing. Telangana has developed the state OER platform using the MediaWiki CMS. Andhra Pradesh also has its state OER platform. The [http://teacher-network.in/OER/index.php Teacher Network] (on which this toolkit is available) can be used as a initial state repository. This site has been established and being maintained by IT for Change. Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia ([http://cemca.org.in CEMCA]), an inter-governmental organization of the Commonwealth countries helped establish this platform. |
| | | |
− | Principles of SROER design | + | === Principles of SROER design === |
| | | |
| ==== SROER design ==== | | ==== SROER design ==== |